Deepak: after the adoption of the objective resolution, five sub-committees are appointed, which deals with fundamental rights. I would request mylords to kindly read para 5 [of submissions] which will show that article 25(2), as it exists, was always meant to be a proviso to article 25(1). That is, it was never intended to affect article 26 whatsoever is an argument that has been made through interpretational grounds, but I am showing historically this was a case. I am only saying history of these provisions show article 25(2) was meant as a limitation only on article 25(1) it speaks of "nothing in this article" and there is reason for it.