Uttarakhand High Court
Candidates Lacking Prescribed Qualification Cannot Claim Eligibility On Basis Of 'Equivalent' Or Higher Qualification: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a batch of writ petitions challenging rejection of candidature for various posts advertised by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, reiterating that a Selecting Body cannot treat any qualification as equivalent to the prescribed qualification in the absence of an enabling provision in the applicable rules or the advertisement. Reiterating...
Pursue Civil Remedies First: Uttarakhand HC Sets Aside FIR Alleging Demolition, Theft & Encroachment Of Mussoorie's Modi Bhawan
The Uttarakhand High Court has quashed an FIR registered against persons connected with Radha Swami Satsang Beas (RSSB) in relation to allegations concerning demolition of 'Modi Bhawan', theft of valuable articles and encroachment over the property.“Once both the parties (have) already availed civil remedy by instituting separate suits in respect of the same property then initiation of...
Repossession Clause Doesn't Permit Banks To Take Law Into Their Own Hands; Vehicle Seizure Without Due Process Illegal: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that existence of a repossession clause in a loan agreement does not authorize a financial institution or its agents to take law into their own hands for recovery of dues. The Court further reiterated that although disputes arising purely out of contractual obligations ordinarily may not warrant interference under Article 226, a writ petition would...
Mere Association With Gang Leader Cannot Justify Property Attachment Under UP Gangster Act Without Nexus To Crime: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that mere association or acquaintance with an alleged gang leader cannot by itself justify attachment of property under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The Court observed that attachment of property affecting rights protected under Article 300A of the Constitution must be founded on specific and cogent material...
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses State's Appeal As 'Not Pressed' Against Single-Judge Order Permitting Eid Namaz At Nainital Ground
A Division bench of Uttarakhand High Court on Friday dismissed as 'not pressed' a Special Appeal filed by the state challenging a Single Judge's order permitting the offering of Eid-ul-Azha (Bakrid) Namaz at Nainital's famous Gymkhana and District Sports Association field. When the matter came up for a hearing on May 29 before a Bench of Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice...
Justice Alok Kumar Verma Tenders Resignation As Uttarakhand High Court Judge
Justice Alok Kumar Verma has tendered his resignation as a Judge of the Uttarakhand High Court with effect from April 30, 2026.Regarding this development, a PIB press release reads thus:"Vide Notification of even number dated 27.05.2026, Shri Justice Alok Kumar Verma has tendered his resignation from the office of Judge, Uttarakhand High Court, in pursuance of proviso (a) to clause (1) of...
Permitting Law Students With Low Attendance To Take Exams Will Bring Lawlessness In Colleges: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court observed last week that permitting a Law student who fails to meet the minimum attendance standard to take exams would be 'counterproductive'. A bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari added that it would bring 'lawlessness' to the educational institutions and would 'diminish' the standard of education. The bench thus refused to interfere with the petition of...
'Adverse Entry In Record Of Govt Employee Not Penalty, Does Not Require Issuing Showcause Notice': Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that an adverse entry or special adverse entry recorded against a government servant is not a penalty under the Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules and therefore does not require issuance of a show cause notice before being recorded. The Court observed that an adverse entry is based on an assessment of the work and conduct of a government...
'Objections Raised By Intervener Cannot Defeat Right Of Decree Holder To Withdraw Execution Proceedings': Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that objections raised by an intervener cannot defeat the right of a decree holder to withdraw execution proceedings, particularly when no substantive adjudication was ever made against the intervener in the original proceedings. The Court observed that execution proceedings cannot be converted into an independent forum for the adjudication of the rights of...
'Government Servant Cannot Be Kept Under Suspension For Indefinite Period': Uttarakhand HC Quashes 5-Year Suspension
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that “a government servant cannot be kept under suspension for an indefinite period ”. The Court was dealing with a case where, subsequent to suspension, disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner included allegations of unauthorised absence and use of a forged Scheduled Tribe certificate to gain appointment.Observing that the petitioner had...
Appellate Court Must Examine Merits Of Conviction While Considering Bail; Cannot Merely Interpret S.430 BNSS As Directory: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that while considering an application for suspension of sentence and bail in a statutory criminal appeal, the Appellate Court is required to examine the merits of the conviction instead of merely interpreting whether Section 430(1) of the BNSS is directory or mandatory. The Court observed that once the appeal against conviction had been admitted, the...