Proof Of Saptapadi Ceremony Not Required At Cognizance Stage In Bigamy Complaint: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings for the offence of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that whether the essential ceremonies of the alleged second marriage, including Saptapadi, were performed is a matter of trial and “cannot be gone into at the primary stage of taking cognizance”.Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in...

YouTuber Can't Invoke Writ Jurisdiction To Restore Channel Deleted Over Alleged Copyright Strikes: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be invoked by a YouTuber to seek reinstatement of a YouTube channel deleted on account of alleged copyright strikes. In doing so the court said that public law remedy is not a relief in a contractual dispute between a YouTuber and the social media platform. The petitioner, a YouTuber, had...

Mere "Seen" Endorsement By Magistrate On Seized Narcotics Not Substantial Compliance U/S 52A NDPS Act: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has observed that a Magistrate's mere endorsement of "seen" on an inventory of seized narcotic substances does not amount to substantial compliance with the certification requirements under Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, read with Rule 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and...

Uttarakhand High Court Closes PIL On Alleged Misuse Of Ancient Ram Temple Property, Cites Magistrate's Inquiry Report

The Uttarakhand High Court has closed a public interest litigation alleging illegal construction and misuse of an ancient temple property at Shri Ram Mandir, Haldwani, after taking on record the City Magistrate's inquiry report. The Court observed that in regard of the inquiry report, it was not inclined to interfere any further in the matter. However, if the petitioner remained aggrieved by...

Expeditious Disposal Of Divorce Case Can't Mean Denial Of Fair Hearing: Uttarakhand High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Against Wife

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that “the direction for expeditious disposal of matrimonial proceedings cannot be construed to mean that a reasonable opportunity of hearing should be denied to either party”. Holding the above, the High Court set aside the Family Court, Haridwar's order where the appellant-wife's right to file defence was closed and the matrimonial proceedings...

Gravity Of POCSO Allegation Alone Can't Justify Denial Of Bail To Juvenile: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has granted bail to a juvenile accused in a POCSO case, observing that the gravity or seriousness of the alleged offence, by itself, is not a valid ground to deny bail to a child in conflict with law unless the case falls within the statutory exceptions contained in the proviso to Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,...

Pensioner Has Duty To Inform Authorities If Full Pension Is Paid Despite Commutation, Recovery Valid: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that where a pensioner continues to receive full pension despite having already received the commuted value of pension, it is the pensioner's duty to inform the authorities if the department inadvertently fails to make the stipulated monthly deductions. The Court observed that a pensioner cannot retain amounts wrongly received due to such an...

LiveLaw Uttarakhand High Court Half-Yearly Digest: January To June 2026

Uttarakhand High Court Allows E-Mail And WhatsApp Service Of Summons In Cheque Bounce CasesCircular Number: C.L. No. 03/UHC/IT/NI-Digital Courts/2025Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (UK) 1The Uttarakhand High Court has allowed summons in cheque bounce cases to be served through electronic modes, including e-mail and WhatsApp. The directions are issued in line with recent guidance of the Supreme Court...

Bank Account Cannot Be Frozen Merely Upon Communication From Another Bank: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that a bank account cannot be frozen merely on the basis of a communication received from another bank alleging an erroneous transfer of funds. The Court observed that, in the absence of an order passed by a competent Magistrate or any competent investigating authority, a bank has no authority in law to freeze a customer's account, and such action...

Tinder Relationship Turning Sour Doesn't By Itself Amount To Rape On False Promise Of Marriage: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that where two adults enter into a consensual relationship after meeting through a dating application like Tinder, the relationship cannot subsequently be termed as one based on a false pretext of marriage merely because it later turns sour and does not culminate in marriage. The Court observed that the allegations disclosed a consensual relationship and not...

'This Is Gunda Gardi, What Authority Did You Have?': Uttarakhand High Court Slams Police For Detaining Politician En Route CJP Sansad March

The Uttarakhand High Court on Tuesday (July 21) orally questioned the State Police as to under what authority it had detained Uttarakhand Parivartan Party (UPP) president Prabhat Dhyani en route to the Cockroach Janta Party's march towards Parliament in Delhi on Monday. At the outset the counsel for the State submitted before a division bench of Justice Ravindra Maithani and Justice...

Uttarakhand High Court Transfers Corruption Trials Against Former Jim Corbett Director & Senior Forest Officials To Special CBI Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has directed the transfer of two vigilance cases against a former Director of the Corbett Tiger Reserve and other senior forest officials to the Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, CBI, Dehradun, holding that the designated CBI Court alone has jurisdiction to try cases investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation. The Court observed that once the CBI had...