LiveLaw Allahabad High Court Weekly Round Up: August 3 - August 9, 2026

NOMINAL INDEX Swami Shiv Swarupanand Ji Maharaj vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 514Udayveer Singh vs. Rent Tribunal and 2 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 515Sobaran & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 516Sarita Devi vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko. 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 517Kanahi and others vs State of UP 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 518Murari Lal And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 519Manoharlal (Deceased) and 4 others vs. Jagdish Prasad Goel 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 520P vs. V 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 521Putti Lal vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Power Lko. And Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 522Anil Verma vs. State of U.P. and 3 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 523Bharat Lal Gupta vs. State of U.P. and Another 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 524The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Smt Rachna Singh and 2 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 525Rakesh vs State of U.P. and others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 526The Cricket Association of Uttar Pradesh vs. Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association and 6 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 527Indra Pati And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 528Harikesh Verma vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 529Randhir and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 530M/s Anu Enterprises through Proprietor Anu Singh vs. State of U.P. through Additional Chief Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Lucknow & 6 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 531Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India and 3 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 532Shivalik Small Finance Bank Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 533Prof. Sanjay Mittal vs. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources and Development and 3 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 534Gurmel Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 535Dr Awadhesh Kumar Tripathi vs. State of U.P. and 3 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 536Sant Ram Gautam Constable vs. State Of U.P. Thru Secy And Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 537Rayeesh Ahmad vs. State of U.P. and others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 538Dhanendra Kumar Pandey vs. State of U.P. & Another 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 539State of U.P. and 3 Ors. vs. Raj Narain Yadav Constable 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 540Vinod Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 541Vemula Venkata Vinay Babu Alias Vinay Vemula vs. State of U.P. and 3 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 542Rakesh Kumar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 543Ankur Tandon vs. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Home Department 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 544XXX vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 545Hasan Ahmad vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 2 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 546M/s Aims Max Gardenia Developers Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory vs. Mrs. Pratibha Gupta 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 547 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE WEEK Allahabad High Court Calls For Crowd Behaviour Science To Prevent Stampedes At Mathura-Vrindavan Religious Gatherings Case Title: Swami Shiv Swarupanand Ji Maharaj vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 514 Case citation: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 514 The Allahabad High Court has held that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution casts a positive obligation on the State to create and maintain conditions in which lives are not lost to preventable disasters. It held that institutionalising the science of crowd behaviour in academia, administration and policy is a constitutional imperative. Disputed Signatures On Photocopy Can't Be Sent For Handwriting Examination Without Original Document: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Udayveer Singh vs. Rent Tribunal and 2 others 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 515 Case citation: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 515 The Allahabad High Court has held that disputed signatures appearing on a photocopy of a document cannot be referred for scientific examination by a handwriting expert where the original has not been produced, since a photocopy does not preserve the characteristics on which a meaningful comparison of handwriting depends. It held that the decisive consideration is whether the material proposed to be examined can furnish dependable scientific assistance, and that this assessment lies within the discretion of the authority before which the document is produced. Last Seen Theory Alone Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Three In 1996 Double Murder Case Case Title - Sobaran & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 516 Case citation: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 516 The Allahabad High Court set aside the conviction of 3 men in a 1996 double murder case while observing that a conviction in a case based on circumstantial evidence cannot be sustained solely on the "last seen together" theory/evidence unless every link in the chain of circumstances is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court found that in this case, the...

LiveLaw Allahabad High Court Weekly Round Up: August 3 - August 9, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

LiveLaw Allahabad High Court Weekly Round Up: August 3 - August 9, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers