Rajasthan High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 25 - May 31, 2026

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 198 to 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 214NOMINAL INDEXMilap Chand Dandiav v State of Rajasthan; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 198State of Rajasthan v Smt. Seems Jakhar; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 200Karan Pratap Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 202Prem Prakash Bidyasar v State of Rajasthan, and other connected matter; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 203Taimoor v State of Rajasthan; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 204Anil Prakash Goyal & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Anr., and other connected matter; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 205Sonu Ram v State of Rajasthan & Anr.; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 206Vinod Kumar v State of Rajasthan & Anr., and other connected matters; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 207Saisuda Chuennok v Union of India; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 208State of Rajasthan & Anr. v Dr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, and other connected matters; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 209N v State of Rajasthan & Anr.; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 210Vaibhav v State of Rajasthan; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 211State of Rajasthan v Rajeev Kumar Rana; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 212R v State of Rajasthan; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 213Puranmal v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 214Order/Judgments of the WeekRajasthan High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Pension For Ex-MLAs, Dismisses PIL Challenging 1956 LawTitle: Milap Chand Dandiav v State of RajasthanCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 198The Rajasthan High Court has rejected a petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly (Officers and Members Salary, Emoluments, and Pension) Act, 1956 (“Act”), insofar as it provides pensionary benefits to former Members of the Legislative Assembly (“MLAs”).The division bench of Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur observed that petitioner's interpretation of reading an implied prohibition against grant of pension to former legislators, in the Constitution, was not correct. Such prohibition could not be inferred in the absence of any express constitutional limitation.Rajasthan High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail Granted To Woman SHO Accused Of Diluting NDPS Case For ₹10 Lakh BribeTitle: State of Rajasthan v Smt. Seems JakharCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 200The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed the bail cancellation application filed by the State against a woman SHO, accused under NDPS, opining that once the bail was granted, it could not be cancelled in a mechanical manner or merely because the offence was serious.After hearing the contentions, the bench of Justice Ashok Kumar Jain referred to the Supreme Court case of Abhimanyu Etc. v State of Kerala, to hold that bail once granted could be cancelled only if any of the bail conditions were violated, or the accused misused liberty, or tampered with evidence, or influenced the witnesses.Compassionate Appointment For Kin Of Permanently Disabled Employees Applicable Even If Accident Predated Rules: Rajasthan High CourtTitle: Karan Pratap Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 202The Rajasthan High Court has held that date of accident has no relevance while considering application for compassionate appointment under Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Permanent Total Disabled Government Servants Rules, 2023, if on the date of enforcement of the Rules, the condition of permanent total disability existed.The bench of Justice Anand Sharma observed that the Rule did not prohibit considering of such cases where the accident that led to the permanent total disability occurred prior to the date of enforcement of such Rules.“Court finds that the petitioner cannot be discriminated by the respondents by raising an artificial grounds which is not available under the Rules of 2023. The Rules nowhere specifically prohibits consideration of such cases where accident has taken place prior to date of enforcement of such Rules.”Rajasthan High Court Asks State To Consider Establishing Well-Equipped Investigation Labs For Expeditious Criminal ProbesTitle: Prem Prakash Bidyasar v State of Rajasthan, and other connected matterCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 203The Rajasthan High Court held that in the current era of rapid pace, where criminals were adopting the latest and advanced techniques to commit crimes, the investigation mechanism of the police has to be strengthened with modern and well-equipped Investigation Labs that have adequate scientific facilities.The bench of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand highlighted the unavailability of such labs in Rajasthan and the resulting reliance of the State Police on reports and analysis from labs situated in other states. It was opined that this causes unnecessary delays, thereby violating the right of fair investigation and speedy trial.Superior Police Officer Can Order Further Investigation Before Filing Of Charge-Sheet: Rajasthan High CourtTitle: Taimoor v State of RajasthanCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 204The Rajasthan High Court has made it clear that a superior Police officer has the authority to direct further investigation and permission for...

Rajasthan High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 25 - May 31, 2026

Nupur Agrawal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Agrawal

Rajasthan High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 25 - May 31, 2026

Nupur Agrawal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Agrawal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers